beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.07.23 2019고단1755

공무집행방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around May 16, 2019, the Defendant assaulted the victim on the roads B of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and on the roads B, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul (the 55 years of age), the victim C (the 55 years of age), without any reason, by taking the victim’s clothes three times, by drinking the victim’s chest, and by walking the victim’s legs on two occasions.

2. 공무집행방해의 점 피고인은 위 제1항 기재 일시, 장소에서 피고인이 행패를 부린다는 내용의 112신고를 받고 출동한 서울서대문경찰서 D지구대 소속 경찰관 E으로부터 행패를 그칠 것을 요청받자 위 E에게 심한 욕설을 하고 위 E의 국부를 향해 발길질을 하다가 경찰조끼 부분을 때리고 발로 가슴을 걷어찼으며, 손톱으로 함께 출동한 위 지구대 소속 경찰관 F의 왼쪽 손목 피부를 긁고 발로 위 F의 배를 걷어차는 등 하여 위 E과 F을 폭행하였다.

As such, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order, crime prevention, investigation, etc. of the above E and F, police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement to F and E;

1. A written statement of C and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (to attach a list of 112 reported cases and a work log, to check screen pictures of police officers in mobilization, G telephone conversations for witnesses, and verification of evidence evidence pictures by police officers);

1. The point of assaulting relevant legal provisions on criminal facts: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (with respect to the obstruction of performance of official duties on the market)

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are as follows, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the oral argument of this case shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the following circumstances.

An unfavorable circumstance: A series of circumstances leading to the crime are not good.