When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 22, 2017, at around 22:51, the Defendant: (a) took a bath view that the mother F of the victim’s mother F of the victim’s apartment C Apartment D’s residence in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon Metropolitan City, was not drinking the Defendant, and (b) destroyed the Defendant’s repair cost on the estimate by breaking the front door of the residence twice the front door of the instant reticulating 33m ( approximately 40cm in length, approximately 12cm in diameter), and destroying the front door of the instant reticulating, and destroying the shocked door of the victim’s glass, which was located in the glass of the front cement, and the air-proof net.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and damaged the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of G;

1. Partial recording of witness E in the fourth public trial protocol;

1. A letter of arrest of a flagrant offender on April 22, 2017;

1. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence, the defendant may be found to have damaged the victim's property, such as facts constituting the crime.

① immediately after the instant case, a person suffering from the loss, “Before the loss of the windows, the person who was frighted, broken the windows by bricks, and escaped.

" and 112 reports have been filed, and the defendant has received a summary order and judgment in 2014 and 2015 due to the damage of the victim's door.

It is known that the damaged person was the defendant as the offender.

② 피고인을 현행 범인으로 체포했던 경찰관 G은 이 법정에서 피고인을 범인으로 특정하게 된 경위에 관하여, ‘ 뒤쪽으로 도망갔다는 신고자 말에 따라 아파트 뒤쪽으로 추적을 해서 피고인을 발견했고, 신고자가 피고인을 지목하였다’, ‘ 현장에서 시멘트를 만졌더니 손에 가루가 묻었고 터는 과정에서 옷에도 묻었는데, 피고인 발견 당시 피고인 바지에 하얗게 묻은 자국을 보고 같은 시멘트 가루로 추정이 되어 더 이상 의심하지 않았다’ 는 취지로...