공무집행방해등
Defendant
A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of four million won.
Defendant
B The above fine shall not be paid.
Punishment of the crime
1. 피고인들의 업무방해 피고인들과 D는 2014. 6. 23. 00:40경 울산 남구 E에 있는 피해자 F가 운영하는 'G 노래방'에서, 피해자가 도우미 비용을 지급하라고 하자, 약 40분간 동안 피고인 A은 “야 이 씹할 년아, 술집하는 년이 뭘 안다고 지랄이야. 나는 북한에서 넘어와서 아무것도 무서운 게 없어, 개 같은 년.”이라는 등으로 큰 소리로 고함을 치고, 피고인 B은 “개 같은 년, 이제 술집 시작하는 년이 장사하기 싫은가 본데, 뒤집어 엎어버릴까.”라는 등으로 큰 소리로 고함을 치고, D는 “도우미 값은 못 주겠다.”는 등으로 큰 소리로 고함을 치는 등 소란을 피워 위 노래방에 있던 손님들을 떠나가게 함으로써 위력으로 피해자의 노래방 영업 업무를 방해하였다.
2. The Defendants’ obstruction of the performance of official duties were called upon to the police officer I and J belonging to the Ulsannam Police Station H District on the ground that there was disturbance, such as Paragraph 1, at the same time, at the same place as Paragraph 1, and Paragraph 1, and the Defendants were called to the Defendants. Defendant A sent to the above I, “I” consciousness, son, and son. The police son of the Republic of Korea, a bitch bitch son, a bitch bitch, and a bitch bitch son, a bitch bitch son, a bitch bitch bit, a bitch bitch, a bitch, a bitch bitch bitch fch fch fch fch fch fch fch fch fl, and the Defendant B did not arrest Defendant A, etc., and the said I did not interfere with the execution of duties by the police officers during the crime of crime.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against Defendant D or A;
1. Each police statement made to F and I;
1. Application of receipts, damage photographs statutes;
1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 314 of the Criminal Act.