After becoming aware of the victim, the Defendant borrowed 100 million won or more from the time of marriage, and did not pay the borrowed money. They did not pay the borrowed money and continued to receive money from the victim to use it as living expenses, etc.

Whether a party to a marriage has been married or divorced in the past, and whether a party to a marriage has a child is a very important factor in determining the other party’s intention to marry. In particular, the other party to a marriage is more important and more important in determining whether the other party to the marriage was married, and as if the other party did not have any marriage but has no consciousness, the other party to the marriage would be aware that the other party did not have married with the other party, and eventually deceiving the victim, and eventually, the Defendant’s horses would put up a marriage ceremony with the victim who is believed to be all the horses of the other party, and the other party was unable to engage in a normal marital life due to

1. Around August 30, 2007, the Defendant made a false statement, “Around August 30, 2007, the Defendant, at the victim’s house located in Taean-gun E, Taean-gun, that “A vehicle need to be replaced with money, and that he is not able to complete payment.”

However, the defendant did not have any particular property at the time and did not have any special income, so even if he received the purchase price from the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay it.

As above, the Defendant had the victim pay 1,659,00 won on the same day as the down payment for the vehicle, 790,000 won on the name of October 31 of the same year, and 787,681 won on the name of November 30 of the same year, and had the victim pay 3,236,681 won in total.

Accordingly, the defendant is the victim.