However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the father of the victim B (12) who is a child.

1. In 2016, the Defendant committed the following crimes: (a) at the Defendant’s home located in Seongbuk-gu, Changwon-gu, Changwon-si, Seongbuk-gu, Sungdong-gu, Sungdong-gu, Seoul; (b) from the injured party, “Wonlon on the flon’s flon to the flon’s flon’s flon.”

Recognizing the horses, “A child’s body was damaged or physically abused the physical health and development of a child, such as blicking the victim’s head, blicking twice the victim’s head, and blicking the victim’s head.”

2. The Defendant committed the crime in 2017 A, on the ground that the victim did not study in his/her official book at the above location on the day of 2017, and on the ground that the victim did not do so, the Defendant committed physical abuse against the victim’s body by impairing the victim’s body or impairing physical health and development.

3. Around October 6, 2017, the Defendant committed a physical abuse on the part of the victim, on the ground that the victim did not study in his/her book at the same place, and on the ground that the victim did not do so, the Defendant committed a physical abuse of the victim’s body, by making the victim’s hand floor 10 times more than 10 times, with the victim’s scam, head, neck, etc., and scam (a thickness of approximately 1.5cm), thereby damaging the victim’s body or impairing the health and development of the body.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;

1. Details of text messages;

1. Photographs;

1. E-record CDs containing the victim’s statement process (the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court may sufficiently recognize that the Defendant committed each act identical to that stated in the facts charged in this case, and in light of its content and method, it is reasonable to deem that such act constitutes physical abuse, which may harm a child’s body or harm the physical health and development of a child, and it does not constitute a normal decoration or decoration, and it does not appear that the contents of paragraphs (2) and (3) of the facts charged overlap.

Therefore, it is true.