When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 10, 2020, the Defendant was employed by the head of the management division in an apartment in which the victim B is a representative of occupants, and was dismissed on the same day at the request of the victim, and was not adequate for the victim to appraise the victim, and the Defendant was in the head of the Madong Pungsan Happing Rest located in the Gan-si flood area around 07:00 of the same month.

The phrase “the victim was the victim at the same place as at around 07:00 of the same month, and the previous damage was the victim’s “Nabab” to the defendant at the same place.

In the presence of an unspecified number of residents, such as defects, D, and E, “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.”

Along with the Pladmona, I special the special character.

p. The same gue shall be killed at the time of gue.

In the case of a width, “the victim is openly insulting.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. A written confirmation of facts of witnesses;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports ( telephone communications of a person who prepares a fact confirmation document);

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.