When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 20, 2015, the Defendant filed a claim for ownership of a public project operator of the insolvent hot spring No. 1 located in the bankruptcy hot spring No. 887-3, which had been insolvent at the time of the Simdong on March 20, 2015, and interfered with the victim’s business of repairing hot spring over two hours by force, such as: (a) filing a claim for ownership of a public project operator of the said insolvent hot spring No. 1 located in the village of the bankruptcy hot spring No. 887-3; and (b) preventing entry into the said hot spring repair work.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C Witness’s testimony;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of field photographs);

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (the minor threat of force is insignificant and a substitute reflects the wrongness);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.