beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.03.23 2016고정807

상해등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000, and by a fine of KRW 400,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 21, 2016, Defendant A around 21:20, at India, the F convenience store located in E, Defendant: (a) carried the victim’s male-friendly arrest victim B (19 years old, south) who was contacted by telephone from the victim G; (b) carried the victim’s float, and the victim B’s float face on the drinking face; and (c) carried the victim B’s float, with which the number of days of treatment cannot be identified.

2. 피고인 B 피고인은 전항과 같은 일시, 장소에서 전항의 범죄사실 기재와 같이 자신에게 상해를 가하는 피해자 A에 대항하여 피해자의 멱살을 잡아 바닥에 넘어뜨리고 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴을 1회 때려 피해자에게 2 주간의 치료를 요하는 무릎의 으깸 손 상 등을 가하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to H, G, I, and J;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 of the same Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution in consideration of the following: Defendant A: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the fact that the Defendants agreed smoothly after the indictment and the fact that it appears to be a contingent assault case;

1. On May 21, 2016, at around 21:20, the Defendant: (a) purchased a horse in front of the K cafeteria located in the city of Jeju; (b) purchased the horse at the above K cafeteria; and (c) without permission, cross the said K cafeteria to F convenience gate with I et al.

In the above process, as the police was exposed and the Stick was issued, the victim G was found at that time and the F convenience point was used to cross the K K cafeteria without permission.

J(65 years of age, women) has been under the control of unauthorized crossing.

Accordingly, outside of the instant case, J followed Defendant and Defendant 1’s non-party activities, and thereby, I (45 years, women) who are the first-party of Defendant 1, and I (45 years, women) will be in the future of this K cafeteria.