[2017 Highest 2713] The Defendant was a person who purchased merchandise coupons through an Internet site from January 2016.

On October 7, 2016, the Defendant provided that “10,000 won merchandise coupons may be purchased at 70,000 won and sold at 96,000 won in total at 70,000 won if the purchase cost of merchandise coupons is offered at 70,000 won or at 70,000 won if the purchase cost of merchandise coupons is offered at 10,000 won or at 70,000 won if the purchase cost of merchandise coupons is sold at 70,000 won or at 50,000 won if the principal and re-sale proceeds are sent from the Defendant’s agricultural bank account from the person who believed the purchase cost of merchandise coupons, and received 3,50,000 won from the victim who believed it as the price corresponding to 50,000 won merchandise coupons via the Defendant’s agricultural bank account from March 6, 2017.

However, in fact, the defendant had been trying to perform the obligation to the other party to the transaction with the funds received from the above victims because he did not properly provide approximately KRW 200 million merchandise coupons to the other party while doing the transaction of merchandise coupons prior to this, and there was no intention or ability to return the profits from the transaction of merchandise coupons with the funds of the victims.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victims, acquired the total amount of 141,775,00 won from the victims.

[2017 Highest 3362] On October 25, 2016, the Defendant sold 100,000 won GS principal gift certificates to the victims E, who had been engaged in merchandise coupon transactions through the domestic site and Kakao Kakao Stockholm, around October 25, 2016.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the defendant has been involved in the transaction of merchandise coupons before that time, and there are approximately KRW 200 million merchandise coupons to the other party to the transaction.