beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.12.23 2015노4436

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is under a favorable condition, such as the confession of the crime of this case while committing the crime of this case, the defendant actively cooperates in the investigation of narcotics, such as making a statement to and arresting the drug supplier (one top line) at the time of investigation by the investigation agency, and the most of his family members to support the crime of this case. However, the crime of this case is not only twice a phiphonephone, but also once a single dose, and it is also necessary to strictly punish and eradicate the crimes of narcotics in light of the addiction of narcotics and the harm caused by administration of narcotics. In particular, the crime of delivery of narcotics in the above crime requires more severe punishment by spreading and distributing narcotics in a way that it is omitted to others' addiction to narcotics, and the defendant has been subject to the same or criminal punishment (including three times a motor vehicle punishment) for the same crime of this case, and the defendant has been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime of this case without any consent of the defendant during the execution period of the crime of this case without any consent of the Supreme Court.

Recommendations for basic crimes and concurrent crimes (basic areas, aggravated factors - previous and previous crimes within three years, mitigation factors - important investigation cooperation: imprisonment of one year to two years, and the range of final recommendations following the aggravation of multiple crimes: imprisonment of one year to one year, or one year to two years, or one year to one.