If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 19:30 on November 26, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 19:30 on the part of “C” located in the Daedong-gu Daedong-gu B, the Defendant: (b) “C,” and the president, “Influent Lone Star, I performed an operation on the part of the infinite, I am her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her hers her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs (10 pages of investigation records);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the Defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, it is difficult to find out that the Defendant had committed the instant crime even if he/she partially denied the fact of the crime, but has not been absent twice on the trial date.

In addition, the defendant did not make any effort to recover damage.

The above circumstances and results of the instant crime, and the overall circumstances, such as the character and conduct of the Defendant, shall be determined as per the disposition.