유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. B (hereinafter “the deceased”) was a fertilizer and chemical product producer on August 9, 1996, and as a business place subject to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”), D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant company”), a business place subject to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”) and has worked as a technology development room researcher at the manufacturing factory (280 regular workers; hereinafter “instant factory”).
B. In the above technology development room, the work schedule is organized into four groups A, B, C, and D-4, and the working hours are divided into three categories: “15:00 hours”, “23:00 hours from 15:0 to 23:00, and “23:00 hours from 23:0 to 7:00 hours from 23:00,” and “16:0 hours from 4:00 hours from 4:00 to 4:00 hours from 4:00 hours from 4:0 hours from 4:0 to 4:00 from 3:0 to 16:0 for each service group (hereinafter “the above working method”).
On July 9, 2013, the deceased, as an employee of the foregoing Article B, worked in shifts from 15:30 to 17:30 of the same day, and participated in the B-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-
In this case, ‘the death of this case' is ‘the death of this case'.
D. On December 31, 2013, the Plaintiff, a wife of the Deceased, asserted that he/she died from his/her duties and claimed the payment of bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant. However, on March 27, 2014, the Defendant did not have a proximate causal relation between the deceased’s work and the death of this case.