2. It is recognized that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflected his mistake.

However, the crime of this case is a case where the defendant left office for a total of nine days without justifiable grounds while serving as public interest service personnel. The defendant has been punished several times due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, larceny, property damage, insult, obstruction of performance of official duties, assault, etc., and the fact that his whereabouts were unknown for a considerable period after leaving his service, etc. are considered disadvantageous to the defendant. There are no special circumstances or circumstances that are newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the court below, and there are no changes in the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, and various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in the arguments and records of this case, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.