2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

A. In the case of loans claim filed by H on December 16, 2003 by the court against I and J 2003Na29837, I and J shall be jointly and severally paid KRW 15,00,000 to H until February 10, 204, and the same year

5. up to October 10, 500,000 won, and the same year.

8. 5,00,000 won shall be paid by 0.10. If the above 15,000,000 won shall be paid by 10.10% per annum from August 11, 2004 to the date of full payment, plus damages for delay calculated by 20% per annum from August 11, 2004 to the date of full payment.

"" has established adjustment of the contents.

(b) thereafter, the network A (hereinafter referred to as "the network");

On March 29, 2008, a copy of the succeeded execution clause was served on I and J on March 29, 2008 when H transferred the claim based on the above protocol of mediation, and the deceased was served on I and J as the executive title, and the deceased was issued a seizure and collection order for the claim against six financial institutions such as deposits in I and J Seoul Northern District Court No. 2009TTTB2679 on March 11, 2009, but did not actually reach the collection order.

C. J on its behalf on July 30, 201, the apartment of this case is "the apartment of this case between the defendant and the defendant, Seo-gu, Incheon, and not more than 10,000 M apartment of 10,000 Dong 303 and 10,000."

The lease contract of this case (hereinafter referred to as "the lease contract of this case") is the lease contract of this case with the term of 20,000,000 won, monthly rent of 700,000 won, and the term of 20,000 won from August 13, 2011 to August 12, 2013.

Since August of the same year, the apartment of this case is located together with I and other family members.

The deceased, on May 2, 2013, made the above protocol of mediation as the executive title, was issued with the Incheon District Court 2013TTTTT12162, which was the claim amounting to the claim amount of the lease deposit against the defendant of I and J as KRW 41,071,233, and the attachment and collection order was issued with respect to the claim amounting to the lease deposit against the defendant of I and J. The written decision

6.3. Service was made to the Defendant, the garnishee.

I, J, and K appeal against the above seizure and collection order.