난민불인정처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasons for this court's explanation is as stated in Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasons for this case are the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of the first instance, except in the following cases.
- In the refugee interview application, the Plaintiff asserted the ground for applying for refugee status: (a) the refugee interview application, stating that “The Plaintiff visited the border of a Siria, was arrested at an organization of the Italian Government, and was threatened to participate in the Italian War,” but during the refugee interview investigation, the Plaintiff asserted the ground for applying for refugee status at all different times, “I are under threat of life from the flusium on the ground that he/she made a conversation as a woman and flusor of the flusium.”
② The Plaintiff asserted that he was a pro-Japanese, who was an opportunity to threaten in the course of refugee interview investigation, rather than a relationship between a woman of patriarche and a woman of patriarche. However, in the court of first instance, it is difficult to believe the Plaintiff’s statement as it is because the Plaintiff’s statement is not consistent, by asserting that it is a relationship with the above woman
2. As such, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.