If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Around June 30, 2011, the Defendant: (a) at the C Apartment Guard’s office of security guards; (b) although there was no fact that the complainant received the openings from the security guards E, the Defendant damaged the complainant’s reputation by openly pointing out false information by inserting the notice of dismissal as a person who was either received a warning or the end of the time, or by using it, so far as possible; (c) other members (E) at the same time 201 to the chemical team; (d) written the notice to the head of the office of the management; and (e) by paying the openings of the vehicle to the head of the office, stating that “I will point out that I will be disqualified for the manager, and submit a written petition.” (d) At the same time, I will put the 1, 4, 7, 8, 12, and 12, such apartment building into the mail.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes verifying contents;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;