beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.07.23 2014고정660

상해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is between the victim C and the neighbor.

On November 16, 2013, at around 22:30, the Defendant, as a matter of parking in the street room in Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Geumnam-gu, 3869, the Defendant, as a matter of parking, brought the victim's face to drinking times, and got off the victim's body up to the floor, and caused an injury to the victim, such as a string of a chest 14 days, which requires the victim's body to be treated.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C, D, and E;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of injury (C), the Defendant asserted that, in the case of the victim and the Si expenses, the victim only bleeped the victim’s face while drinking, bating bat, fating fat, making the victim’s face, bating the victim’s face, bating the victim’s face, and bating the victim’s face, etc., and thereafter, when the victim’s wife E and the victim’s wife E are combined with the victim’s wife, the Defendant unilaterally met the victim’s and his family members, and thus, it cannot be acknowledged that the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim.

살피건대, 증인 C, D, E은 이 법정에서 피고인과 피해자가 시비 중 피해자가 피고인의 멱살을 잡자, 피고인이 주먹으로 얼굴을 때리고 피해자를 밀어 바닥에 넘어뜨리고, 발로 찼다는 취지로 진술하여 공소사실에 부합하고, 증인 C은 이 법정에서 자신이 먼저 피고인을 폭행한 사실을 인정하고, 증인 D, E은 피고인이 자신들을 때린 것은 고의가 없을 수도 있다며 고소를 취하하는 등 진솔한 태도를 보여 증인들의 진술의 신빙성도 충분히 있다고 보인다.

Therefore, since the facts charged in this case are proved without any reasonable doubt, the defendant's assertion is rejected as it is without merit.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Detention at a workhouse;