물품대금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 48,872,418 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from June 1, 2017 to February 20, 2018.
Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire pleadings in each statement of Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2-1 through 5, and Gap evidence 3, the plaintiff supplied the goods to the defendant from January 2017 to May 31, 2017, and it can be recognized that the plaintiff was not paid the price of KRW 48,872,418. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 48,872,418, and to pay to the plaintiff 5% per annum as prescribed by the Civil Act from June 1, 2017 to February 20, 2018, which is obvious that the delivery date of the copy of the complaint is the delivery date of the copy of the complaint, and from the next day to the day of full payment, 15% per annum as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings.
As to this, the defendant alleged to the effect that some goods were returned, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted for the reasons and it is so decided as per Disposition.