응급의료에관한법률위반등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Of the facts charged in the instant case, the indictment against insult is dismissed.
Punishment of the crime
No person shall interfere with the rescue, transfer, emergency treatment, or medical treatment of an emergency patient by persons engaged in emergency medical services by means of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, threat, or other means, or destroy, damage, or occupy medical facilities, equipment, medicines, or other instruments for emergency medical services provided by a medical institution, etc.
Nevertheless, around 22:00 on July 17, 2015, the Defendant sent back to the emergency room of Kimcheon-si Kimcheon-si Kimcheon-si, 24 Kimcheon-si to the emergency room of the 119 Emergency Medical Center. On the same day, around 22:23 on the same day, C, who is a doctor in the emergency room, wishesed to administer a large amount of injection to the Defendant. C, which read, “this chrone, eropoch, mathroth, math of bitom, meth of bitom, meth of bitom, and meth of 2 years old, who have shown high-pressure symptoms, tried to take emergency measures against a female patient, and divided conversations with nurses, as above, and interfered with the emergency medical services by force.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;
1. Statement made by the police against C;
1. Written statements of D;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports [including photographs attached thereto];
1. The reason for sentencing of Article 60(1)1 and Article 12(1)1 of the Act on the pertinent Article of the Act on Criminal Crimes and the Emergency Medical Service for the Selection of Punishment (Selection of Imprisonment) is that the Defendant committed the instant crime despite the fact that the Defendant is currently under probation, and the Defendant’s act is very dangerous that the Defendant’s act may cause serious injury to his/her life and body by hindering and delaying the treatment of other emergency patients, and is highly likely to cause social criticism.
However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected his mistake, and the doctor C in charge of emergency medical services.