However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, at around 00:17 March 17, 2019, drive DK5 cars not covered by mandatory insurance while under the influence of alcohol level 0.070%, at around 00:0:17, at around 00:17, the Defendant driven the DK5 car to the F market on the side of the E University.

To proceed as an opposite lane, the U.S. came to be a U.S.ton.

Since the location is a road where the center line of yellow domin line is installed, the defendant engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to make a U.S. internship at the point where the U.S. is permitted.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, while neglecting this, was driven by the injured party G (the age of 27) who was driven in the opposite lane due to the negligence of the central line, and was driven by the injured party G (the age of 27) as the rear part of the said K5 vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above business, damaged the victim G (27 years of age) by causing approximately two-day injury to the spawal cule, such as salt chills and tensions, and the victim I (27 years of age) who was on a spathal car, in need of approximately two-day medical treatment, such as spawal culums and tensions, and the victim J (28 years of age) who was on a spathal car, in need of approximately two-day medical treatment, and at the same time damaged the damaged vehicle in excess of KRW 2,907,344.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of G, I and J;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Report on the statement of the state of drinking drivers, and inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Each motor vehicle insurance certificate:

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of statutes on specifications for checking and maintaining automobiles;

1. Article 3(1), proviso of Article 3(2)2 and 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 148-2(2)3 and Article 44 of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018; hereafter the same shall apply from June 25, 2019) concerning criminal facts.