1. On March 27, 2005, the Defendant, who committed fraud against the victim C, displayed the written contract for sales in lots to the victim C at an unspecified place, and falsely concluded that “The Defendant, who received the sales in lots from the Gyeonggi-gun D building, 369 to 374, received the registration of ownership transfer and received the money as security, and then repaid the money.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any special occupation at the time, and there was no intention or ability to repay money to the victim even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim due to the lack of value, such as notification of the invalidation of the Defendant around 2004.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 12 million from March 27, 2005 to July 27, 2005 from the victim.

2. On April 22, 2005, the Defendant committed fraud against the victim E showed the sales contract form with the victim E at the middle-term branch of one bank located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, and makes a false statement to the effect that “If the Defendant lends 80,000,000 won to the victim E, the Defendant would pay interest and would pay it five months after paying it, and if the Defendant received 369 to 374 of the D building in Jung-gu, Young-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, Seoul, with the payment for the work, the Defendant would receive 369 to 374 of the Plaintiff’s D building with the payment for the work, the Defendant would transfer the said shop sold in lots from 241,000 won

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any special occupation at the time, and there was no intention or ability to transfer the said stores, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim due to the lack of value, such as the Defendant’s notice of invalidation in 2004, with respect to the said stores, which had been voluntarily suspended the subcontracted construction.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 80 million from the victim.

3. The victim F.