성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (3 million won in punishment, and 40 hours in order to complete a sexual assault treatment program) is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment is favorable to the defendant, such as that the defendant was waiting for committing the instant crime and has no record of punishment.
However, the crime of this case committed by the defendant is committed against many unspecified persons in a public place and is likely to be criticized.
subsection (b) of this section.
In addition, comprehensively taking account of the fact that there is no special change in circumstances that the court below and the punishment are different in the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.