A. The Plaintiff is a person operating cement-processed products manufacturing business, such as block and boundary stone, with the trade name “C” in Jeju-si, and the Defendant is a corporation that runs stone construction business and stone processing business at its domicile.

B. Around March 2013, the Plaintiff and the Defendant engaged in the transaction of supplying road boundary stones to the Defendant, the Plaintiff and the Defendant prepared a settlement statement to verify the price of the goods that the Defendant did not pay to the Plaintiff by the time as follows (hereinafter “instant settlement statement”).

D Field: border seat 210 ¡¿ 300 】 500 】 2,400 】 2,720,000 E site: border seat x 250 x 250 x 50 x 11,000 x 11,250 x 150 x 150 x 50 x 2,100 x 6,000 x 12,600,000 won =

3. New stones (F) : 40,570,000 won in total amount of 7,000,000 won in fee: Provided, That since the above amount is the amount of provisional settlement, the actual amount of settlement shall be approved with the amount finalized after the completion of the regular settlement of accounts after the completion of the settlement of accounts. [Grounds for Recognition] Fact that no dispute exists, Gap evidence 1 and Eul evidence 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination

(a) Determination as to the cause of the claim 1) Evidence Nos. 2, 3, 9, and 10 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) as to the above-mentioned facts, Gap evidence 2, 3, and Eul evidence No. 9, 10

2) In light of the purport of each entry and argument of the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, as the chain of the D Maintenance and Construction Business (hereinafter referred to as the “D Maintenance and Construction”).

Upon receipt of a request for the supply of materials, such as boundary stones, and introduction of the defendant to the Yustogsto the Yusto to supply the boundary stone. The plaintiff agreed from the defendant that the defendant would be paid 2,400 won per unit of boundary stone supplied by the defendant to Yustogstogs. Accordingly, the defendant supplied 7,511 boundary stone from April 201 to August 12, 201 respectively.