On April 18, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution and observation of protection in six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court for larceny, and on April 26, 2016, the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 26, 2016, and was revoked on June 24, 2017, and is still serving in the prison in order of the government.

On March 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 09:15, the convenience store operated by the victim C, which is equivalent to the total market value of KRW 5,600,00, 640,000, out of C, and stolen it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal accidents;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 329 of the Criminal Act in relation to the relevant criminal facts and Article 329 of the choice of punishment [the scope of recommendation] [the scope of punishment] There is no person who has no basic area (from June to January to June] (the special sentencing person] (the decision of sentence is inevitable in light of the defendant's history of the same kind of crime] (the decision of sentencing).

Provided, That the amount of damage is small and the amount of damage is immediately recovered, a sentence that is lower than the lower limit shall be imposed in consideration of the fact that the damage is immediately recovered.