손해배상(기)
1. Within the scope of the property inherited from the network E to the Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B shall be KRW 30,000,000 and this shall apply.
1. On June 1, 2010 in the Gwangju High Court case of damages for damages (the claim) between the Plaintiff and the Defendants in Gwangju High Court of 2009Na1671, the Defendants paid KRW 30,000,000 to the Plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited from E, and KRW 20,000 to the Plaintiff by July 30, 2010. If the Defendants fail to pay the above money by the payment date, the Defendants paid the unpaid amount plus damages for delay calculated at a rate of 20% per annum from the day following the date of payment to the day of full payment. The above decision was rendered in lieu of conciliation. The fact that the above decision became final and conclusive does not conflict between the parties, or can be recognized by taking into account the entire purport of the statement in subparagraph 1 and the entire arguments.
According to the above facts, the plaintiff filed the lawsuit in this case for the extension of the extinctive prescription period of the decision in lieu of the above conciliation, and the defendant Eul is obligated to pay 20% per annum from July 31, 2010 to July 9, 2020 to the service date of the copy of the complaint in this case against the defendant Eul, 12% per annum from the next day to the day of complete payment, and 20 million won from July 31, 2010 to the day of complete payment as the plaintiff seeks from July 31, 2010 to the day of delivery of the copy of the complaint in this case against the defendant Eul, as the plaintiff seeks from July 26, 2019 to the day of complete payment.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.