교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 3, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving a vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license in D from the roads adjacent to the Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si to the roads adjacent to the Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, to the roads adjacent to the Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si.
2. On October 3, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driven the said car without obtaining a driver’s license on October 18, 2016, driving the said car, and driving the road in front of Seocheon City at the speed of about 10 KK in the direction of the Bupyeong-si University from the boundary of the free market.
Since there are no lanes, and there are frequent pedestrian traffic, the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front door and the left door and the left door, and accurately manipulating the steering and steering devices of the motor vehicle.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected his duty at the front week and got off the victim E (28 tax) who passed by the said passenger car with the right-hand side of the said car by negligence while neglecting his duty.
Defendant 1 suffered approximately two weeks of elbows, etc. from the above victim due to the above occupational negligence.
3. On October 3, 2016, the Defendant also called “F with no license in Korea,” and was involved in an accident. The Defendant also called “F with no license in Korea.”
On October 5, 2016, 2016, the non-licensed accident made a statement to the effect that the punishment is inevitable even if comprehensive insurance is subscribed, and that the punishment is paid instead of the accident, and that the F, who consented to the request, made the statement to the effect that the F, as if he were the driver at the transportation expense and the traffic investigation team of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station.
Accordingly, the defendant instigated the criminal to avoid.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;
1. Statement made by the police for E;
1. The actual survey report and the report on occurrence of traffic accidents;