A. 1) The Plaintiff is a company established and operated for the main purpose of online education, work development and distribution business, etc., and is a copyrighted work of the video lecture as indicated in the attached Form (hereinafter “instant copyrighted work”).

(2) Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) provides a web-dried service (hereinafter “instant service”) that enables users to download, read, and edit file at the Internet site (hereinafter “instant site”) which is established for the main purpose of online information provision business, etc., and provides users to download, read, and edit file by allowing other users to download file (hereinafter “instant service”).

3 Until June 9, 2017, Defendant B was the only executive of the Defendant Company and directly executed the instant services provided by the Defendant Company until the appointment of Defendant B. C.

B. The copyright of the copyrighted work of this case, including instructors who set up foreign languages, such as English, Japanese, Chinese, French, French, German, Spanish, Russian, Spanish, Spanish, Posia, Italian, Italian, Vietnam, arche language, solar language, Indian, Mongolian, Mongolian, Turkey, and Chinese Chinese characters, are included in the film of the subject work, in which the subject work of this case is individualized in accordance with the skill level or purpose of use of the language. On May 8, 2006 and July 4, 2014, under a contract to grant or transfer the subject work of this case to the Plaintiff by contract with E and E, the copyright was granted to the Plaintiff through the same content. In the case of a film work of an instructor who has no such contract, the Plaintiff is indicated as the publisher of the work.

C. The instant case.