When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a taxi engineer and the victim B is a passenger of C-si operated by the defendant.

On October 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 01:10, the name of Young-gu, Young-gu, Suwon-si, the 32 new from the long distance of the 32th Sung-si, the victim and the victim wanted to attach a taxi number to the mobile phone; (b) the victim was able to have his son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son, and caused the de

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. A damaged mobile phone photograph;

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the images of CCTV images held by the Defendant’s assertion pursuant to Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are consistent with the victim’s statement, and that the Defendant was faced with the victim’s hand while moving to close open rear doors, according to the images of CCTV video CDs, the lower part of the taxi at the time of the instant case is recognized as having been closed, and the mobile phone in the instant judgment is recognized as being sealed by considerable shock, rather than merely facing the difference, in view of the fact that the mobile phone in the instant judgment was sealed by considerable shock.