2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The status of the parties is that the Plaintiff was treated by E University Hospital operated by the Defendant Educational Foundation B (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”); Defendant C is a principal in the Repulmonary medicine department within the Defendant Hospital that treated the Plaintiff; Defendant D is a nurse in the secondary patient room where the Plaintiff was hospitalized.

B. The Plaintiff’s internal history and the progress of hospitalization (1) around 18:07 on July 1, 2012, the Plaintiff was subject to various tests at the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital, and as a result of the examination, around 19:36 on the same day, the Plaintiff was under the following conditions: 9:36 on the same day: 19:36: Hexanedo 98%; blood pressure; 130/70; 80 times/minutes; 80 times/minutes; 20 times/minutes; 36

The defendant hospital admitted the plaintiff to the hospital because it is doubtful of the lack of human nature of the plaintiff.

(2) From July 2, 2012, when the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, from around 14:25, when he was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff appeared to have deteriorated food and clothing, and the Defendant Hospital inserted the Plaintiff in the engine to the Plaintiff, and as a result, integrated the Plaintiff’s telegraph as a suppression, the Defendant Hospital used the suppression force only against both descendants from around 15:30 on the same day.

As above, the defendant hospital presumed that the cause of the plaintiff's oral discussion aggravated the smoking waste by allowing the guardian to take food to the plaintiff.

(3) On July 2, 2012, the Defendant Hospital decided to move the Plaintiff to a middle patient room, and the Plaintiff was admitted to a middle patient room around 17:50 on the same day.

The Defendant hospital administered the Plaintiff, a stroke, to the Plaintiff, and supplied the Plaintiff with the oxygen via the artificial reagur while combining the Plaintiff’s two descendants according to the suppression.

C. A measure (1) around 05:05 on July 5, 2012, 2012 (hereinafter in this paragraph, the date is omitted) was found to have occurred for the Plaintiff.

(2) At the time, the Plaintiff’s oxygen was measured at 88-90%, and Defendant D applied the Plaintiff’s oxygen to 5 L/C, and reported the Plaintiff’s status to Defendant C.

Defendant C is protegrified.