(a) The name of the invention of this case (Evidence 4) 1: C2); the filing date of the application; the patent number; the claims 4); the manufacturing process of double expropriation 1; the manufacturing process of double expropriation ; the manufacturing process of double expropriation ; the process of double expropriation ; the process of manufacturing double expropriation 4; the process of double expropriation ; the process of double expropriation ; the process of inserting the inner upper part of the claim ; the process of double expropriation ; the process of double expropriation ; the process of inserting the inner part made of the said ceiling or synthetic resin into the upper part; 【the process of double expropriation ; the process of inserting the inner part of the claim ; 【the process of inserting the inner part of the claim ; the process of inserting the inner part of the claim ; 【the process of inserting the inner part of the claim 5; 【the process of double expropriation ; the process of inserting the inner part of the claim 【the upper part of the claim ; 【the process of making double expropriation 4; and 【the process of double expropriation 【the upper part of the claim 5, etc.】

B. The invention subject to confirmation of the invention in question is related to “a flag armed riot,” and the description and drawings thereof are as shown in [Attachment 2].

C. On May 7, 2014, the Defendant filed a claim against the Plaintiff for a trial to confirm the scope of protection of the instant patent invention with the Intellectual Property Tribunal. 2) The Intellectual Property Tribunal deliberated the said request as 2014Da1057.