If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Bchip car.

On May 30, 2020, the Defendant driven a franchising car at around 12:55 on May 30, 2020, and led to the driving distance of municipal ordinances from the tri-distance toward the four-lanes in front of the D Bank located in Macheon City C.

Since there are places where safety signs, which are signs indicating the prohibition of straight dust on the floor of one-lane, have a duty of care to drive a person engaged in driving service according to the direction indicating the safety signs.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the back part of the victim E (the 75-year-old driver’s seat) driving in the same direction as the victim E (the 75-year-old driver’s seat), which was driving in the same direction as the Defendant due to the negligence of neglecting it, with the front part of the driver’s franchise for the Defendant’s driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the injury to the victim G (the remaining, 78 years old) who was a knee and tension that requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim E, such as salt pane and tensions, which require approximately two weeks of treatment, and the victim H (the 86 years old) of the same passenger in need of approximately three weeks of treatment to the victim H (the 86 years old). The Defendant suffered from the victim I (the 91 year old), the same victim I (the 89 years old), and the same victim J (the 89 years old age), such as knee and other kne that needs to be treated for about three weeks of treatment, and the salt and tension of the part of the spe and tension.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. 교통사고 보고⑴⑵

1. Application of each written diagnosis report (related to the attachment of a photograph to the boom scam images) (related to the attachment of a photograph to the screen scam images);

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order.