However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 01:20 on August 11, 2015, the Defendant received a demand from the police officer H(29 years of age) belonging to the police officer of the Daegu Pacific Police Station G District G District, who was called upon by the Defendant on the F main points located in Seogu-gu, Daegu, Daegu, and received a report to cause disturbance due to the drinking value, and received a demand from the police officer of the police officer of the Daegu Y Police Station G District G District, and the said police officer “this weather, Article 1 of the Constitution, 1 of the Act on the Performance of Duties of Police Officers, is deemed to have been changed, or Article 1 of the Act on the Performance of Duties of Police Officers, is deemed to have been changed,” and the Defendant took the chest of the police officer for drinking.

In addition, when a police officer intends to take a cell phone site to collect evidence, the defendant tried to drive the police officer's hand, arrest the police officer as a flagrant offender, and to arrive in the G Area, thereby obstructing the police officer's legitimate performance of duties concerning the suppression and investigation of the police officer's crime by assaulting the police officer, such as attempted to drive the police officer's hand, attempted to leave the G Area as a flagrant offender, and attempted to escape the police officer's shoulder.

On October 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 02:10 on October 10, 2015, the Yongsan-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 933-2, the Defendant demanded that the said patrol vehicle, who was under the patrol, stop the said patrol vehicle from her own patrol to her seat, and stop the said patrol vehicle to her seat to her seat; (b) obstructed the operation of the said patrol vehicle along with the bath theory; (c) obstructed the operation of the said patrol vehicle; and (d) obstructed the operation of the said patrol vehicle by cutting the arms of the slope K, which is a police officer belonging to the said patrol unit, who controls the said patrol vehicle, she pusheded the chest part of the said K’s chest at one time with the two hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the above K concerning 112 patrols.

Summary of Evidence

"2015 Highest 1314"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. The G District Work Day "2015 Highest 1635";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of K;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the occurrence of cases;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution is Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing).