However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle C with the intention to drive the vehicle.

At around 14:55 on July 15, 2015, the Defendant came to turn to the left at the right turn one lane between the three-lanes of the Do between the two-lanes at the intersection of 524 Banmpung-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon.

Since the location is an intersection with a signal apparatus, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive safely according to the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the victim D (the age of 26) who dried the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signal to the right side from the left side of the proceeding direction by negligence in violation of the signal and received the victim D (the age of 26) in front of the left side of the Defendant driving vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a ductating the right to the right, for about eight weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition of a traffic accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the violation of criminal conduct, the absence of any record of criminal punishment exceeding a fine, the purchase of a comprehensive insurance policy, and the reaching an agreement with the victim), etc.;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the order to attend a lecture [decision of types] for general traffic accidents (the injury of traffic accidents) - In cases where illegality in the proviso of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Improvement of Aggravations is serious (the decision of the recommended field] [the decision of the recommended area] 4 to 10 months [the scope of recommendation] - In cases where the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance for mitigation factors is serious and serious, the injury is not serious.