However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 00:44 December 20, 2012, the Defendant argued the issue of the payment of taxi expenses at the office located in the Seoul District Office of the Jeonsan Police Station, Yansan-si, Yansan-si, and the issue of the payment of taxi expenses from his name-free taxi officers and taxi drivers. The Defendant heard that he would threaten the above D's head by putting his cell phone off with "if the police officer is drank with the taxi expenses, it will be drawing," and putting his cell phone off with "if the police officer is dicking with the shooting movement and drinking it, it will be killed." On the other hand, the Defendant threatened the above D, and continued to "I am hick, dead, hicking," and used the civil petitioner who was kept in the office to assault the above D.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties in relation to the above D's global service as a police official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, work days in the C District, and investigation reports (C DistrictCCTV screen analysis reports);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, the main sentence of Article 59(1) of the Act on Probation, etc. [the decision of sentence] / [the scope of obstruction of performance of official duties, suspension of sentence / [the scope of sentence ] 6 months to 1 year and 4 months / [the decision of sentence ] The crime of this case is good for the defendant to commit the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties, such as displaying his mobile phone to a police officer who would pay taxi expenses at the police district office in the police district office. However, the crime of this case is divided in depth into the defendant, but the defendant is not guilty, and there is no criminal record of the same kind or suspension of execution of official duties, the degree or damage of the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and crime.