유류분반환
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants is modified as follows. A.
See Attached Table 1.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, except for the following: (a) Chapters 2 through 18, 14, and 16, 15, 17, and 11, respectively, are the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The part used in height [No. 2 and No. 14th 18th 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance] 2. The case where the scope of the deceased's basic property for calculating legal reserve is examined first, and then the case where there is no dispute over the property of the deceased, but is disputed as to whether the property is included in the scope of the basic property for calculating legal reserve. A) The part transferred from T on December 10, 1993 to T on the part of the deceased's 1,265th 1,265th 1,265th 420 of the purchase price of the above land was completed to T on December 10, 1993, and the part of the sale price of the above land was divided from the above land to 30th 1,265th 4th 4th 4th 1, 1994, and it was found that there was a lack of evidence as to the ownership transfer registration of the deceased's 3th 198th 7/196.