beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.04.25 2015구합69578

손실보상금

Text

1. The defendant 34,099,420 won, 87,014,050 won, and 25.25.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) A public notice of project approval, public notice of resident inspection, and public notice of a compensation plan, etc. - The name of the project: Public housing project (E District (hereinafter referred to as the "E District Project") - The date of public notice for resident inspection: March 31, 2010 - The date of public notice for public inspection: the date of public notice for public inspection of project approval: the G- the date of public notice for public inspection of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on October 14, 2010 announced by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on May 26, 2010: the date of public notice for

(b) subject to confinement - Plaintiff A: Attached Form

1. Table “Land” - Plaintiff B D: H, I, and J each land listed in the said Schedule (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant land,” and the individual land is specified only as the parcel number): K, L - Plaintiff C, M, N (862/2,317 equity) land - Plaintiff D: N (1,455/2,317 equity), O, P, and Q land

(c) The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation on February 26, 2015 - The date of commencement of expropriation: April 21, 2015.

The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection made on September 17, 2015 - The Central Land Tribunal’s central appraisal corporation, the central appraisal corporation, the future appraisal corporation, the Plaintiff C and D: the Gyeong appraisal corporation, the Gyeong appraisal corporation, and the appraisal corporation of the said Plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as “Objection’s appraisal”): Compensation for losses: Attached Form

1. The phrase “an indemnity ruling” as indicated in the table is as follows.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including virtual number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. The court’s appraisal and the court’s appraisal on the assertion on the rise in the land price of each of the instant lands and the appraisal on the appraisal and the appraisal on March 22, 2016 on the appraiser R of this Court (hereinafter “court appraisal”) were conducted or being conducted within the lower city, including the Scenic Zone project, in calculating the amount of compensation for losses for each of the instant lands, a development project that is being conducted or being conducted within the lower city, such as the Scenic Zone project, a public housing project in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, adjacent to the Hanam-si, and the Songpa-gu Seoul.