공무집행방해
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
Around 00:00 on December 1, 2019, the Defendant assaulted the police officer E (the age of 39) at the entrance roadside of the 112th floor, which was called “the former husband fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers and the escort of arrested flagrant offenders.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement made to E by the police officer;
1. A copy of the F Statement;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning photographs, such as damaged parts, and photographs;
1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. The crime of this case for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act is committed by assaulting a police officer in uniform and obstructing the performance of official duties. However, although the nature of the crime is less than that of the defendant, the defendant is against the recognition of the crime of this case, the defendant has no record of punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties, and the defendant has no record of punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment