When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 1, 2017, the Defendant was requested to return home after obtaining identification from the police officer D belonging to the police officer of the Daegu North Korean Police Station C District, who was called up after receiving 112 reports among the disputes over the issue of taxi drivers and the taxi fares on December 23:25, 2017, to the above D, “whether or not the police officer is,”

At the time of the identification card No. d, personal information was d, personal information was leaked, and the trial cost was blicked, and the head and body was flicked with the front window of the patrol vehicle boarding the above D who want to start for patrol, and the head and body was collected, and the vehicle was blicked for about 30 minutes to stop from departing.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to Chapter II of work log, the list of reported cases, and the photograph of damaged patrol vehicles;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are favorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s acknowledgement of the instant crime and reflects the mistake, the primary offender, the police officer’s use of indirect tangible power by prohibiting the police officer from departing from the patrol vehicle, rather than exercising direct violence, and other factors such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, motive or circumstance of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as per the order.