However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) went to the main point of “D’s operation” of the victim C, which is located in Chang-si, Chang-si, Chang-si, Seoul, about 23:40 on the same day while drinking alcoholic beverages three times at a middle school conference; (b) however, the Defendant: (c) expressed the victim’s desire to “the victim, who is under the same influence of alcohol, so far as he does not drink, fat; (d)” on the ground that he does not drinking alcohol; (d) provided the victim’s “the victim, who is under the same influence of alcohol; and (e) provided the victim’s desire to talk to other customer E, etc., who was on a public prosecution, and interfere with the victim’s business operation by abusing it for about one hour, such as “the victim, who shall talk with the dog or kira,” and by force.

2. The Defendant’s insult at around 00:40 of the following day from the victim G during the police box of the Jinhae Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving the report from the above C at the above main station.

Sheetists of the horses, such as “Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Before being notified that “,” etc. may be punished for a crime of insultd by the injured party, and that further, “a shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shots will grow.”

The victim publicly insultingd the victim in the presence of many customers other than the above C, by referring to “,” etc.

3. The Defendant, at around 00:55 on the same day, voluntarily accompanied the police box of the Jinhae Police Station F Station located in the same Gu H to undergo an investigation for the foregoing reasons, and the Defendant, who interfered with the performance of official duties, voluntarily accompanied the said G, and then cut the flag to the said G.

Before doing so, “I will not take money,” and the G being prepared for the investigation was able to keep the head of the G at the hand and interfere with the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation of the crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to C and G

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 136 of the choice of punishment.