However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2014. 2. 26. 01:10경 서울 강남구 신사동에 있는 지하철 신사역 인근 길거리에서 피해자 C(41세)이 운전하는 D 택시 뒷좌석에 승차하여 위 택시가 서초IC 부근 남부순환로를 서초IC 방면에서 예술의 전당 방면으로 시속 약 60km로 진행하고 있을 때, 술에 취해 아무런 이유 없이 욕설을 하며 피해자의 머리 뒷부분을 발로 4~5회 차고, 계속하여 피해자가 위 택시를 정차한 후 택시에서 내리자 따라 내려 그의 목과 가슴을 주먹으로 때리고, 정강이를 발로 찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the confirmation of screen pictures and videos, and video CDs);

1. Article 5-10 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that an order to attend a lecture has been punished for the same offense as the one of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, and that a driver who is in operation under the influence of alcohol has committed several times, the liability for such offense is not weak;

However, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the defendant is against his own mistake, the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim, and all the sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment