A. In determining the facts, the Defendant was only her face of the victim C, and did not have committed an act such as breaking the victim’s face over the floor and breaking the victim’s face.

B. The court below, in its incomplete hearing, recognized all the indictments of the prosecutor who is either unilateral and convenient, and judged, but there are other objective witnesses than the witness of the court below, and there is sufficient proof of the defendant's assertion according to other evidence records.

C. The court below found the Defendant’s justifiable assertion that the Defendant unilaterally committed violence and did not investigate, and the witness made a false assertion. The prosecutor tried to punish a fine of KRW 500,000,000,000, even though he tried to have a fine of KRW 500,000.

The sentence of the lower court on unreasonable sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 대하여 피고인은 원심에서도 동일한 취지의 주장을 하였으나, 원심은 그 판결서 중 ‘피고인의 주장에 대한 판단’의 제목 아래에서 ‘증인 C, D, E은 원심 법정에서 피고인과 피해자가 시비 중 피해자가 피고인의 멱살을 잡자, 피고인이 주먹으로 얼굴을 때리고 피해자를 밀어 바닥에 넘어뜨리고, 발로 찼다는 취지로 진술하여 공소사실에 부합하고, 증인 C은 원심 법정에서 자신이 먼저 피고인을 폭행한 사실을 인정하고, 증인 D, E은 피고인이 자신들을 때린 것은 고의가 없을 수도 있다며 고소를 취하하는 등 진솔한 태도를 보여 증인들의 진술의 신빙성도 충분히 있다’고 하면서 피고인의 이 부분 주장을 배척하였다.

Examining the evidence and records duly adopted and examined by the court below, the above circumstances presented by the court below can be recognized, and the defendant also 's correspondence from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below 's trial.'