The execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On July 17, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) driving C strawa car from theology in front of the old-gu elementary school located in the beginning stage of the nuclear power plant, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.089% among blood transfusion around 08:20 on July 17, 2016, to the normal distance in front of the old-gu elementary school.

2. The Defendant, who violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes”), driven the above-mentioned vehicle at the time of the above day and driven the road of four lanes in front of the above elementary school along the two-lanes from the distance of the private road in the vicinity of the entrance

The former is an intersection where signal, etc. is installed. Thus, the Defendant, who was engaged in driving a motor vehicle, has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the traffic signals and prevent accidents in advance. However, the Defendant neglected to do so and failed to do so, and the Defendant entered the intersection to turn to the left, due to the occupational negligence that entered the intersection to turn to the right, and the victim D (W, 48 years old) driving on the right side of the motor vehicle in the latter part of the victim D(W, 48 years old), driving on the right side of the motor vehicle in order to turn to the right side of the motor vehicle. The Defendant did not take measures such as rescue and relief expenses to the victim F (P, 21 years old) who was on the driving of the motor vehicle for about two weeks, such injury as salt, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, even though it was difficult for the victim F, who was on the driving of the motor vehicle, to have difficulty in treating each vehicle for about two weeks, and did not immediately destroy it to the extent of 160,0.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents, reports on traffic accidents (1), (2), reports on the detection of drivers at home, reports on the circumstances of drivers at home; and