출입국관리법위반
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of ten months;
However, the period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A is a person who operates a dispatched company of human resources called “Company G” (hereinafter “the dispatched company of this case”) in the old and American City F building, and 301.
No person shall arrange or solicit the employment of any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.
Nevertheless, Defendant A, around August 17, 2016, was employed at the entertainment entertainment place operated by the entertainment entertainment place operated by the “J”, a female H, who had no status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities in the instant agency for the instant human resources, as well as from April 2016 to March 2017, Defendant A, in the same manner as the attached Form [Attachment] [Attachment] [Attachment Table (1] 87 Korean women of Thailand and Russia, were employed as entertainment entertainment workers at the entertainment place, and received brokerage fees by deducting 50-8 million won from the monthly salary of the said female, by deducting 50-8 million won.
Accordingly, Defendant A mediated the employment of foreigners who do not have the above status of sojourn eligible for employment activities as a business.
2. Although Defendant B was not allowed to employ a foreigner who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities, Defendant B had the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities from October 13, 2016 to March 7, 2017, and provided that Defendant B paid monthly salary of KRW 140,000,000, as shown in the [Attachment 1] of paragraph (1) at the entertainment entertainment place in the south-gu K (Ground 1st floor) at the port from October 13, 2016 to March 7, 2017, and employed each entertainment source with each entertainment source who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities, such as introduction of female nationals of Thailand who had the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities from A.
Accordingly, Defendant B employed 28 foreigners who did not have the above status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities.
3.