However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 18:55, 2016, the Defendant was required to disclose his personal information from the police station Cridge belonging to the police station of the Jung-gu Government, who was called upon receipt of a report 112 and was in the presence of the police officer, and the police officer in charge of performing official duties. The Defendant was required to detect and detect the fluor of the government fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the Republic of Korea.

20 20 20 6 20 6

“In doing so, I tried to leave the site without disclosing personal information.”

The Defendant committed assault, such as breaking the shoulder, etc. of the above slope D which prevented it by hand, continuing to lock the chest of the above patrolman E, and breaking the rank attached to the shoulder.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to D, E, F, G, H, and I;

1. Written statements of J and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (referring to the cases of testimony of a witness F witness), a report on investigation (referring to a police officer's use of a photograph, and a report on personal history (referring to the cases of the closure of a f witness's photograph) to a police officer;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Where an act of assault or intimidation is committed against multiple public officials who perform the same duties as commercial concurrence, the act of assault or intimidation is established according to the number of public officials who perform the official duties, and where the act of assault or intimidation was committed in the same place at the same time, and is assessed as one act in light of social norms, the act of assault or intimidation committed in the same manner is in a relationship of conceptual concurrence;

In other words, the Supreme Court Decision 2009Do3505 Decided June 25, 2009, etc.). Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The Criminal Act, the suspension of execution;