When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 29, 2017, at around 20:45, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the report case by assaulting the Defendant’s 112 police officer’s 112 police box affiliated with the police officer, who was called “C” restaurant located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-si, Sungnam-si, with the report of 112, he prevented the Defendant from doing his act. The Defendant she committed assault by assaulting the Defendant on the following occasions: (a) on the part of the Defendant, the Defendant Doc police box affiliated with the police box of the branch of the police station of the branch of the branch of the police station of the branch of the branch of the police station; (b) on the part of the Defendant, the Defendant 1 took the Defendant’s noise.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the defendant does not have any record of punishment exceeding the same criminal records and fines for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the confession of the crime of this case and attitude against the defendant are shown, the degree of violence against the police officer is relatively not more severe, the defendant's disease appears to have partly affected the crime of this case, and other circumstances under Article 51 of the Criminal Act are considered to be determined by the sentence as per Disposition.