When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 10:00, when the Defendant was living in Gwangju Mine-gu C, 203 Dong 706, the Victim D (44 years old); (b) on the apartment site of the victim, the Defendant did not have access to the apartment site of the victim; (c) on the part of the victim, the Defendant: (d) there was no access to the apartment site of the victim; (d) on the part of the victim, the Defendant secured the distance of the apartment house; and (e) opened the apartment house of the victim’s apartment site of the victim; and (e) opened the apartment house of the victim with the width of the width of the width of the width of the knick, the Defendant made it clear that the Defendant’s reputation was damaged by openly stating the false fact that the apartment resident of the apartment who entered this site had access; and (e) on the same date, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the victim’s reputation was damaged by publicly pointing out the fact that the victim’s reputation was damaged.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each domain copy;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;