In order to order the provisional payment of an amount equivalent to the above fine.

B is a business owner and a person in charge of safety and health management, who is the actual operator of the defendant in the Sincho City C, and the defendant is a corporation established for the purpose of the manufacture, sale,

Where workers are likely to be dangerous because of the operation of minculator, crushor, string, mixture, etc., or raw materials are scattered or are likely to be scattered, a business owner shall take necessary measures, such as installing a cover on the relevant part, etc.

Nevertheless, B did not establish a sub-mixr used at the Defendant’s workplace from September 2013 to October 7, 2014, and the Defendant did not take measures necessary to prevent industrial accidents as above with respect to the Defendant’s business at the same time and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to supervision marks on safety and health of manufacturing business, supervision reports, corrective instructions, corrective orders, and written orders of suspension of use;

1. Article 71, subparagraph 1 of Article 67, or Article 23 (1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;