The lower court found the Defendant guilty of all the charges on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on illegal solicitation in the crime of occupational embezzlement, illegal obtaining intent, and modification of indictment, or by misapprehending the rules on proof, and modification of indictment.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.