성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that each sentence of the lower court against the Defendants (two years of suspended sentence in June, and four million won in fines) is too unreasonable.
2. The Defendants were led to the confession of the Defendants, and they did not have the same criminal power to the Defendants.
However, the act of arranging sexual traffic in this case is highly harmful to society by commercializing women's sex and undermining sound sexual culture and good morals, and Defendant A is the owner of the entertainment tavern in this case. Defendant B, who was in charge of the operation of the entertainment tavern in this case, is not subject to the responsibility of the Defendants in that it was a person who was in charge of the operation of the entertainment tavern in this case and was in charge of the Defendants.
In addition, in full view of the motive, means and result of the instant crime, the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, health status, criminal records, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, and all the sentencing circumstances indicated in the records, the lower court’s punishment against the Defendants is too unreasonable.
3. The Defendants’ appeal is without merit and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.