However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 14, 2019, the Defendant accepted a proposal from the Defendant: “Around January 14, 2019, the Defendant, who misrepresented the loan company’s staff, obtained a credit rating by creating a transaction performance of deposits in the passbook and informing the bank account to obtain the loan; (b) withdraw the money deposited in the bank account and then deliver it to the employee; and (c) in so doing, the Defendant accepted the proposal to the effect that “the bank counter staff withdraw the business fund if the reasons for the withdrawal of cash exist.”

On January 11, 2019, an employee under the name of the Scing Mediation Commissioner assumes the employees of the C bank by telephone to the victim although he/she does not have the intent or ability to receive a loan from the victim B, and falsely speaks that “a loan can be made if it is transferred to the C bank D A account, and the card loan shall also be automatically repaid,” and on January 15, 2019, he/she assumes the E card employee from the Fc Bank D account, and “a credit card loan can be made if it is transferred to the C bank D account, and the card loan shall be automatically repaid even if it is transferred.” On January 15, 2019, the victim transferred the sum of KRW 50 million to the C bank account (Account Number: D) under the above Defendant’s name.

On the same day, the Defendant withdrawn 25 million won deposited in the Defendant’s account at the center of the Southern Branch of G Union in Y in Y on the same day, and then exchanged it in cash at the point of the middle branch of G Association in Y in Y at Y at Y on the same day, and then released 30 million won deposited in the Defendant’s account at the center of the Southern Branch of G Union in Y on the same day as the check and delivered it to the Defendant, and then, sent it to the Defendant on the same day after withdrawing 30 million won deposited in the Defendant’s account at the center of the G Union branch in I at Y on the same day.

In this respect, the Defendant aided and aided the fraud of the personnel in charge of using name phishing.